If I was a cartoonist, I'd draw some witty pictures. I'm not, so what's with his absence. I really don't approve of this silent treatment. What is he trying to say?
8 comments:
Anonymous
said...
A great thinker once said:
"....everyone wants to be noticed. Some through deeds, some through thoughts, yet everyone wants their day."
Welcome back, 6A. Although I have to chastise you for leaping to a conclusion and then stating it so indelicately. Correlation does not prove causation.
Coyote, did you go to that menu from the Humane Society? It must have you drooling. It looks to me like the "large rabbits" are the real special of the day.
What the heck? Guys, why are you giving 6A a hard time for saying what he's thinking? I wonder, are you both now writing for 5M? I can see that my ethics note was well timed.
T'ain't ethics, it's statistics, Conch. What we are saying, I believe, is that we have as yet proven no solid link between our actions and the Muse's recent output. The numbers are suggestive, yes, but any number of confounding factors could be in play. We haven't done the research to eliminate them as influences. Or for that matter, even to find out what they are. And I have said, already, that I am an empirical coyote...
Could be she's writing so prodigiously because she's got more time on her hands, not because we provide a captive audience. We just don't know. The chi-squared factor would be the degree of certainty or the level of confidence one may reasonably hold, that there is any statistical correlation at all.
And hey, Nonny: who is this wise guy to whom you so cavalierly omit attribution?
Hello, goodbye
-
It snowed yesterday: 20 cm. I think we broke the record for the most snow
ever on April 6th, which was previously held by 1958.
Here are some of the Spri...
oh heyyyyyyy
-
I just don't blog all that much anymore. I quitly reflect, or write in my
paper journal, or make a candle of a felted fish or whatever. But here are
some...
The Herons and Gran
-
Hanging my laundry today, I looked up and thought "That is a special bird."
When I lived closer to Bronson, I used to see a Great Blue Heron pretty
frequ...
-
I think I never introduced you to my dog. This is Rosa. We have been
together for four years and now we live in the Himalayas. It is spring here
and ever...
Qs & As: The News
-
Sometimes I yell at the people interviewed on the TeeVee nooze. Because
they ask the darndest questions. They’re so puzzled and confused about
whatever tr...
End
-
Unfortunately this blog is ending as of today. If you tried to access it
last night and this morning you'll notice it was locked. Certain things
happened y...
Emergency Meeting Minutes: 21/08/08
-
Where: Virtual Global iPhone meeting When: 21/08/08, 11:00 AM Eastern Time,
on the second derivative of the convex maxima Present: Everybody The
first fe...
Aroma Meze
-
As usual, i'm reporting on a meal the DCFD's had a few weeks ago. Eight
eager souls attended Aroma Meze on Nepean St., almost directly across
Ottawa's ...
8 comments:
A great thinker once said:
"....everyone wants to be noticed. Some through deeds, some through thoughts, yet everyone wants their day."
Welcome back, 6A. Although I have to chastise you for leaping to a conclusion and then stating it so indelicately. Correlation does not prove causation.
Coyote, did you go to that menu from the Humane Society? It must have you drooling. It looks to me like the "large rabbits" are the real special of the day.
Yeah, Dwarf, but ya can find bunnies anywhere. I feel like foreign food. Maybe Siamese.
And welcome back, Apostle. The short guy is right though -- gotta watch out for that persnickety chi factor. It'll bite ya on the butt otherwise.
What the heck? Guys, why are you giving 6A a hard time for saying what he's thinking?
I wonder, are you both now writing for 5M?
I can see that my ethics note was well timed.
T'ain't ethics, it's statistics, Conch. What we are saying, I believe, is that we have as yet proven no solid link between our actions and the Muse's recent output. The numbers are suggestive, yes, but any number of confounding factors could be in play. We haven't done the research to eliminate them as influences. Or for that matter, even to find out what they are. And I have said, already, that I am an empirical coyote...
Could be she's writing so prodigiously because she's got more time on her hands, not because we provide a captive audience. We just don't know. The chi-squared factor would be the degree of certainty or the level of confidence one may reasonably hold, that there is any statistical correlation at all.
And hey, Nonny: who is this wise guy to whom you so cavalierly omit attribution?
Corrie, was it you who was complaining of feeling like you're in high school? (Maybe it was Siren, Waggie or the Kicker of @55. It doesn't matter.)
All this talk of crushes reminds me of grade 6 and grade 7.
I confess; you've uncovered my deep-rooted love for statistics. But with numbers, it's not a crush, it's a crunch.
Coyote, I thought when you talked about "number crunching" it meant you were chewing more than two mice or voles at a time.
Post a Comment