But, Wag, she's writing her thesis about a Montreal playwright who reputedly, possibly, maybe, unspecified others have said -- have I qualified my fuzzy coyote ass out of any potential defamation suits yet? - C. -- may have boffed Lenny, esteemed author of said book.... then again, who wasn't reputed to have, for awhile?
1) Conchie! How great to hear from you! Is it really you? Where is yer cute little picture?
2) Waggie, 'tis an interesting direction yer charting. While under weigh, "sea lawyers" are frowned on, but as I'm ashore, I'm happy t' speculate with ye.
You mention the postings of the 24th and 25th. The 25th is mostly reviews of Fringe plays. Surely ye're not talking of copyright violation. As harsh as the "Copyfighters" say things are, surely this would all be "Fair Use"
So you must be speaking of slander or libel. Aboard ship or down in the mines, this sort of thing is settled with a quick round of fisticuffs. But from what I understand from an old Paul Newman movie it's more complicated ashore.
There's this question of malice, which does not seem to be absent between 5M and the Kuzac*nt/witch's friend (K/WFF).
Then there's the truth issue: Is K/WFF the slut of the department? That would be a tricky one. By 5M's standards a lass who has sex more often than every six months could be a "slut". Then is K/WFF the slut? If K/WFF could establish that others in the department are more promiscuous, she wouldn't be.
Of course there's also the remarks about K/WFF's trustworthiness...
Aye, Wag, ye've opened a weevilly barrel of hardtack. P'raps ye're also referring to the comment about M's "efficiency" during intimate encounters. Would ye care t'elaborate?
Photos in a church history
-
A few months ago, I photographed the stained glass, interiors, and
vestements at St. Thomas’ Anglican Church in Toronto. It’s a gig which
arose — improbabl...
Hello, goodbye
-
It snowed yesterday: 20 cm. I think we broke the record for the most snow
ever on April 6th, which was previously held by 1958.
Here are some of the Spri...
oh heyyyyyyy
-
I just don't blog all that much anymore. I quitly reflect, or write in my
paper journal, or make a candle of a felted fish or whatever. But here are
some...
The Herons and Gran
-
Hanging my laundry today, I looked up and thought "That is a special bird."
When I lived closer to Bronson, I used to see a Great Blue Heron pretty
frequ...
Qs & As: The News
-
Sometimes I yell at the people interviewed on the TeeVee nooze. Because
they ask the darndest questions. They’re so puzzled and confused about
whatever tr...
End
-
Unfortunately this blog is ending as of today. If you tried to access it
last night and this morning you'll notice it was locked. Certain things
happened y...
Emergency Meeting Minutes: 21/08/08
-
Where: Virtual Global iPhone meeting When: 21/08/08, 11:00 AM Eastern Time,
on the second derivative of the convex maxima Present: Everybody The
first fe...
Aroma Meze
-
As usual, i'm reporting on a meal the DCFD's had a few weeks ago. Eight
eager souls attended Aroma Meze on Nepean St., almost directly across
Ottawa's ...
3 comments:
But, Wag, she's writing her thesis about a Montreal playwright who reputedly, possibly, maybe, unspecified others have said -- have I qualified my fuzzy coyote ass out of any potential defamation suits yet? - C. -- may have boffed Lenny, esteemed author of said book.... then again, who wasn't reputed to have, for awhile?
Or maybe we just liked the title...
1) Conchie! How great to hear from you! Is it really you? Where is yer cute little picture?
2) Waggie, 'tis an interesting direction yer charting. While under weigh, "sea lawyers" are frowned on, but as I'm ashore, I'm happy t' speculate with ye.
You mention the postings of the 24th and 25th. The 25th is mostly reviews of Fringe plays. Surely ye're not talking of copyright violation. As harsh as the "Copyfighters" say things are, surely this would all be "Fair Use"
So you must be speaking of slander or libel. Aboard ship or down in the mines, this sort of thing is settled with a quick round of fisticuffs. But from what I understand from an old Paul Newman movie it's more complicated ashore.
There's this question of malice, which does not seem to be absent between 5M and the Kuzac*nt/witch's friend (K/WFF).
Then there's the truth issue: Is K/WFF the slut of the department? That would be a tricky one. By 5M's standards a lass who has sex more often than every six months could be a "slut". Then is K/WFF the slut? If K/WFF could establish that others in the department are more promiscuous, she wouldn't be.
Of course there's also the remarks about K/WFF's trustworthiness...
Aye, Wag, ye've opened a weevilly barrel of hardtack. P'raps ye're also referring to the comment about M's "efficiency" during intimate encounters. Would ye care t'elaborate?
Arr, Wag, I c'n see I'll have t'be careful who I call a scurvy dog with you around.
Post a Comment