Rogers or Bell?
posted by Aggie
Discuss.
Labels:
decisions,
technology
Posts
Little good ever comes from discussing climate change or nuclear weapons
socially
-
Our social world is ruled by the affect heuristic: what feels good seems
true, and what feels bad we distance ourselves from and reject. We judge
what’s tr...
4 days ago
7 comments:
Aggie, I'm all for the minimalist internet presence in favour of real life thing, but why are you asking this question? It's like asking us to compare virtues of dirt-cheap Chinese MP3 players. There are none.
From personal experience, you know that Rogers and Bell both have become too bloated and too well-covered by federal regulations to care about individual customers, and that both suck raw eggs in the dark. Festering, nasty, odiferous greeny-black ones.
I'm trying to decide the same thing, but I'm wondering: Rogers, Bell, Virgin, Telus, or... a local internet provider? Magma? Storm?
First you call Rogers and ask them for their best deal - tell them you will think about it. Then you call Bell and tell them the deal Rogers gave you, and you then ask them if they can do better - tell them that you will think about it. Then you call Rogers back and tell them the better deal that Bell is prepared to give you... Get the idea? Be sure to have an extra-large latte with Baileys before you start the calls.
Bell + Freenet?
I like Woodsy's technique.
Maybe I'll try Bell + Freenet with a Bailey's chaser. Thnx!
Rogers. I find that they have a funny way with dealing with customers.
If your a girl + speak to a girl = poor service
If your a girl + speak to a guy = excellent service
Anyone else have this sort of experience?
Post a Comment