2005-06-24

Sure, Cohen can write, but can he draw?

3 comments:

coyote said...

But, Wag, she's writing her thesis about a Montreal playwright who reputedly, possibly, maybe, unspecified others have said -- have I qualified my fuzzy coyote ass out of any potential defamation suits yet? - C. -- may have boffed Lenny, esteemed author of said book.... then again, who wasn't reputed to have, for awhile?

Or maybe we just liked the title...

4th Dwarf said...

1) Conchie! How great to hear from you! Is it really you? Where is yer cute little picture?

2) Waggie, 'tis an interesting direction yer charting. While under weigh, "sea lawyers" are frowned on, but as I'm ashore, I'm happy t' speculate with ye.

You mention the postings of the 24th and 25th. The 25th is mostly reviews of Fringe plays. Surely ye're not talking of copyright violation. As harsh as the "Copyfighters" say things are, surely this would all be "Fair Use"

So you must be speaking of slander or libel. Aboard ship or down in the mines, this sort of thing is settled with a quick round of fisticuffs. But from what I understand from an old Paul Newman movie it's more complicated ashore.

There's this question of malice, which does not seem to be absent between 5M and the Kuzac*nt/witch's friend (K/WFF).

Then there's the truth issue: Is K/WFF the slut of the department? That would be a tricky one. By 5M's standards a lass who has sex more often than every six months could be a "slut". Then is K/WFF the slut? If K/WFF could establish that others in the department are more promiscuous, she wouldn't be.

Of course there's also the remarks about K/WFF's trustworthiness...

Aye, Wag, ye've opened a weevilly barrel of hardtack. P'raps ye're also referring to the comment about M's "efficiency" during intimate encounters. Would ye care t'elaborate?

4th Dwarf said...

Arr, Wag, I c'n see I'll have t'be careful who I call a scurvy dog with you around.